User talk:Montana Gy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] List of ThunderClan Cats

A tag has been placed on List of ThunderClan Cats, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 01:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Intro

ThunderClan is the clan who live next is a sample of what i am going to write now ok ....

[edit] Speedy deletion of List of ThunderClan Cats

A tag has been placed on List of ThunderClan Cats, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 01:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as List of thunderclan cats, you will be blocked from editing. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 04:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Disruptive editing and vandalism.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Trusilver (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "your reason here"

Decline reason: "Assuming your reasons are what you state below, no, you did not edit constructively when you vandalized User talk:Sting au in retaliation for the deletion of your article. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

this is not good as i do constructive things and not vandalise unlike other people whp you proply do not do

i wish i could but thanks to you people will have less infomation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montana Gy (talk • contribs)

(ec) I was also reviewing and declining with the comment: "However, that does not explain why you deleted comments on another user's talk page (diff) nor the mildly harassing tone you took toward that same editor (diff). The former edit clearly counts as vandalism. I see no reason to lift the block." —C.Fred (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)