Template talk:MLB yearly infobox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Edits to the infobox
Try not to change things in the infobox that would affect the articles where the infobox has already been placed (i.e. changing OWNERS to owners), as this requires someone to go back and change the code in the other articles. Thank You. --Smarterthanu91 • Talk 00:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Templates are not static things. If they need to be fixed, they need to be fixed. Someone who watches the pages where the template is used will notice and update the template accordingly. I mean, what you are saying is that one a template is created and transclused in an article it can never been changed. That is just silly. — Linnwood 16:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Templates can be changed in an article, I'm fine with that, but something as unnecessary as changing the capitalization of a variable so that many other pages need to be edited isn't worth the work. That is silly. --Smarterthanu91 • Talk 17:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't silly, it is standardization, something Wikipedia could use a lot more of. I have gone through and changed all of the templated in each article it is used in. — Linnwood 04:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am going to delete Uniform Logo from this box, as it requires unneccessary use of a fair use image that can be looked at for the main article on the team, under WP:FURG. Thank you. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 21:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Templates can be changed in an article, I'm fine with that, but something as unnecessary as changing the capitalization of a variable so that many other pages need to be edited isn't worth the work. That is silly. --Smarterthanu91 • Talk 17:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Font size
I think 90% should be a good size for fonts in the infobox. "Smaller" is too small and 95% is too large. Agree/disagree? --Zimbabweed 15:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Idea?
I don't know if this is a good idea, but could we add former cities and/or ballparks to the infobox? Just wondering, maybe it would help. jj137Talk 18:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't really think that is necessary since the infobox is focusing on the team in one particular year, not previous years. --Smarterthanu91 • Talk 00:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

