Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zactaschetti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was meh. The concern of the nominator appears to have been addressed by the user. --Coredesat 05:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Zactaschetti

All content in the page is "edthsrnszfg". Jonathan ^{t - c} 00:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Look, perhaps I'm just a tad apathetic, but that can't possibly be of any harm to the USERSPACE. Are we going to be dictatorial in our enforcement of user page integrity here?--WaltCip 02:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• Meh. Does it really matter? --Carnildo 07:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh per Carnildo above. If the user just wants a blue-linked userpage, who cares? — Gavia immer (talk) 13:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh from me as well, agreeing with Carnildo. It's not as though the user page grossly violates any policies. I know "it's harmless" isn't a reason to keep, but I think here is an exception. Acalamari 17:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  • This isn't an article. "Harmless" is OK here.--UsaSatsui 00:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Actually, I thought that WP:AADD covered all deletion discussions, hence the name. Acalamari 20:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
      • Nope. Most of them apply to all of them, but userpages can certainly be "harmless", and RFDs specificly have "It's harmless" as a keep reason. There's too much stock put in WP:AADD around here, expecially from deletionists. In my eyes, it's meant to promote better discussion, not to shoot down other people's arguments. --UsaSatsui 23:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh. The user could have a better userpage, but there's nothing really wrong with its existence. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 19:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh - what if it's the super-secret code that tells us where the Grail is? Leave it. No real downside, but there's no upside to deleting a user's page, either - it can cause some real ill will, while accomplishing little of importance. - Philippe | Talk 23:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh...okay, it's a sheep vote. But really, who cares? I mean, this was my Userpage for about a year. Nothing says every UP needs to be a work of art, and at least it's not spam. --UsaSatsui 00:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Meh. Who gives a flying frag? It's not spam, advertisement, cruft, or vanity. Let him have the page as he wants it. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Kacheek!)} 23:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Or Meh. Yeah, I mean if we delete this we might as well go ahead and delete every userpage that contains content with rather pointless wording such as, "hi, i'm bob." That would probably end in the deletion of over 200,000 userpages, if not more. --Eye of the Mind 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Way to blow the consesus. :) --UsaSatsui 16:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The page is not harmful in any way and there are alot of similar user pages which are blank or don't make sense. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) (review) 11:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - page could possibly indicate (1) lack of typing skills, (2) a foreign language speaker (no idea what language though), (3) a sense of humor, or (4) simply that the user doesn't want a red link next to his signature. As said above, it's more interesting than "Hi, I'm Bob", and not inherently damaging, unless it's some sort of secret code for the destruction of the planet or something like that. If it were, of course, I would favor deletion. John Carter 15:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep nothing wrong with it. People can have nonsense on their user page if they want to. Hut 8.5 14:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.