Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Traininglibrary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Traininglibrary

User's only contribs are to this page, advertising, did not respond to talk page messages. Quentin Smith 07:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. --Quentin Smith 07:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it is their userpage. --Xyrael ^T 12:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Latitude is granted in userpages for good users who are making serious contributions to the encyclopedia. According to the contribution history, this user has only edited the userpage. That seems to support the allegation that this is spam, not a valid user page. Delete but I'll reconsider if the user begins to make serious contributions to the project. Rossami (talk) 13:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete User clearly has no intent of contributing to the encyclopedia and we should discourage all attempts at attempting to use wikipedia for advertising and spamming like this Ydam 18:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, user is not a Wikipedia editor, WP:NOT a free webhost. Kusma (討論) 01:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kusma. Gwernol 13:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 18:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Kusma. No need to encourage spamvertisers. Grandmasterka 06:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Rossami. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.