Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Toymart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. If the user later resurfaces, I'll happy restore the content at his request (for conversion to other medium, like paper, only). Xoloz 14:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Toymart

Delete. Blatant advertising. The user name is the name of the company. --Bruce1ee 13:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• This does seem to be an inappropriate use of the userspace. The user's contribution history doesn't encourage me either. But I note that this is a very new user. The account was only created this morning. I recommend speedy-closing this deletion discussion and attempting to counsel the user on his/her Talk page first. If the user reforms and begins making valuable contributions to the encyclopedia, we allow some discretion on userpages. Rossami (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Urge hold on decision until ~July 6. Rossami has put a note on his talk page. I would just wait a few days and see if there is any reaction. If none, delete. I would actually counsel a username change too. Martinp 17:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy close for a week per Rossami / Martinp, WP:BITE. ~ PseudoSudo 19:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if, after contact has been made with the user, the page hasn't been cleaned up/advertising removed. Give them a suitable time-limit, though. Could add {{ PotentialVanity }}EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 19:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• NoteAs long as we DONT SPEEDY CLOSE this it will have 8 days to be debated. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • And this is a British company, or at least a British website, so thy're not being forced to act over a holiday. Septentrionalis 13:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising, give it a few more days for the user to remove it. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 13:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam, until the user actually contributes to the project I see no reason for them to have this page. Looks like account was just made to advertise.--Andeh 12:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam, yes, but so far I thought that "users for deletion" is technically impossible, otherwise all those !!!!!!!!! are far worse than this. -- Omniplex 13:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • We can't delete the user, only block him; but we can certainly delete the userpage. If you want to delete some of these, list them here. Septentrionalis 13:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.