Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JennChen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:JennChen

This user has not made a single edit to anything other than his userpage. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps there are deleted contribs? Could an admin verify? -- Ned Scott 05:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. I checked, and I didn't see any deleted contribs. Nevertheless, I would prefer if harmless user pages such as this one were not nominated for deletion. The MfD discussion itself is likely to take up an amount of space comparable to that of the deleted user page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Lack of edits isn't a reason to delete an otherwise valid userpage. --UsaSatsui (talk) 11:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no logical reason for a user who makes no edits to have a userpage. We aren't a webhost. --Rividian (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - our userpage policy gives no special treatment to users based on activity levels. No reason to delete this. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 03:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no indications that this editor wants to make any useful contribution to wikipedia other than playing with the userboxes on his user page --Enric Naval (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• weak keep it's not that unusual for a Wikipedian to set up an account and use it almost entirely for browsing. Maybe they'll become active, maybe not. They note some useful information, like languages they speak. They might have started setting up an alt account and forgot about it. I sent them an e-mail through Special:EmailUser/JennChen, to try to catch their attention. -- Ned Scott 05:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - They don't appear to have been active in the last 6 months, but at the same time, this users userpage is no worse than mine. DigitalC (talk) 06:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment JennChen has responded via e-mail saying "Does that mean it will be? I do not believe that anything I did warrants a deletion." I gave them the url for this discussion. -- Ned Scott 22:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I apologize. I have been making edits to several pages but because of a bug in my computer, I was unable to log in and did not realize it until just recently. -- JennChen 22:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.