Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CBM/verifypermission
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 00:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:CBM/verifypermission
User space is not the appropriate place for something that looks like an official template -Nard 13:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I would be glad to move it to the main space, but really I'm only planning to use it to make one sweep through all the images tagged {{withpermission}}, so I didn't see the point.
- The point of the template is: I'm going through all the images tagged with {{withpermission}} to see if they have anything resembling contact info for the person making the release. You can look at Category:Images used with permission without documentation of permission to see the ones that don't. I will then contacting the users who uploaded the images to try to get better information. For example, User:Morven uploaded many of the train images, and has said he will try to find the copyright release info.
- Keep - This is an admin who does alot of image work. I think that this template is perfectly reasonable especially if it will enable him to save valuable time that he can then apply to further activities. --After Midnight 0001 16:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep User space is a fine place to store and work on templates in progress. --KSmrqT 00:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - He's doing work that not many others are doing, and it will save him time in doing so. Neranei (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

