Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Angel David/Empty Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Inasmuch as the nominator expresses his desire to "repeal" his nomination and as there are no !votes for deletion (nor any other comments or !votes that seem to provide any significant rationale for deletion), I have closed this consistent with, I suppose, WP:SK. Nevertheless, Angel David seemed to suggest to the nominator that he was indifferent to the page's existence and that he did not object to deletion, and so AD may, of course, since he is not at present blocked, tag his page with {{db-user}} at his leisure. Closure is not, it should be said, with prejudice against renomination should Angel David otherwise make clear his intent to cease editing or his desire that the page be deleted, although under the latter scenario another interested editor might reasonably tag the page for U1 (that's probably the longest-ever closure of an uncontested/withdrawn MfD, but that's what one gets from we PIIers). Joe 01:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Joe 01:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Angel David/Empty Page

Has no information, and user doesn't need it. I assume it's a joke page, though the user has a tag down bottom, I don't think he'll need this for quite some time. Also, user needs to be weened off of userspace edits. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-28-2007 • 00:23:27 00:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. User clearly explains his rationale for the page's existence, through the message box in the middle of the page. Deleting this page is simply pointless, and serves no potential purpose other than possibly driving this user away from Wikipedia (especially since one of his other pages was recently unjustifiably deleted). Walton^One 01:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • And the way to "ween [sic] someone off userspace edits" is not to delete all their userpages, IMO; that's more likely to make them leave than contribute. Walton^One 01:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Come on! It's his userspace. What's wrong with poking fun at WikiVandalism?--WaltCip 01:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep (with comment) This one is not violating anything, so there does not seem to be any basis to think it should go. Ask the user to tag it himself for a speedy to let him show he is maturing.--12 Noon 02:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Deleting this page is not going to help anyone, neither him or anybody else on wikipedia, beside the fact that there isn't any reason for deleting it--victor falk 03:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:IDONTLIKEIT, he decides whether or not its deleted. Marlith ^T/C 16:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I am not sure if others are aware of the background on this user. This is related to deleted pages as per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Angel David/God and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Angel David/Yahweh.--12 Noon 21:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Okay, I'll repeal if that's allowed, I was doing it to try to help him, but since no-one else thinks it's worth while, I'll repeal. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-29-2007 • 01:15:32

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.