Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nortel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Nortel

This portal very much resembles an advertisement, which could be seen as violating WP:ADVERT. Creator of the portal is being notified of this discussion. John Carter (talk) 21:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Right now it looks pretty thin, but I suppose if the portal's creator can come up with a plan for fleshing it out... I mean, we do have portals on Microsoft and Apple, among other technology companies. FCYTravis (talk) 02:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

As stated on the portal page (in the "Things to do") this is not an advertisement, and we welcome all input on making this page vendor nutral, just like all the other company protals. We are activaly working on new information for this page and welcome you help. We also need help making the Portal:Telecommunication much better. Both of these portals are very new and need additional information. HammondJr (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xoloz (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now. If the creator can make it more neutral, there won't be anything wrong with it. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The intro page is much better, after HammondJr edited

the page. Jackrabbit2 04:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• KeepI agree with the previous comment, it appears to be the start of a neutral page. Nortel is an industry titan such as Apple or Microsoft, responsible for communications patents and advancements within it's industry. Having a portal is a pretty good idea for providing an overview or launch point for those doing research.909ydc 16:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)909ydc

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.