Talk:Minneapolis Public Library

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Minnesota This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Minnesota articles.

This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Since the building is now complete and functioning, shouldn't an up-to-date photograph or two be added here? Michael Hardy 23:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

God, what an awful buidling. Almost as bad as the one in Seattle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spike2021 (talk • contribs)

Have you ever actually been there? It's a beautiful building! It's absolutely not over-the-top like the Seattle one [1]. —Sesel 03:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] history of the planetarium

The article says:

Until the 2002 closure and demolition of the old central library, the Minneapolis Planetarium found its home there, possessing a projector machine literally older than the space age itself (delivered and installed originally in 1954, three years before the launch of Sputnik I).

But I seem to recall that the biulding demolished in 2002 was built in 1961. Where was the projector installed? Michael Hardy 02:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] references

Not perfect, but they are there. i am removing the tag, also including info on the MPL-Hennepin merger.--Natcase 09:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] post-merger merge articles

We should probably be getting ready to merge articles when the MPL is merged. There's an article for HPL which is pretty skimpy. when do we merge articles--Natcase 09:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merger proposal

The article Outlook Twenty Ten was recently created. I don't think it's notable enough for an independent article, but it may merit a mention here. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 20:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)