Talk:Minion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Split-off typeface?

  • Oppose- splitting a stubbish page into two (mini-)stubs is pointless. May be reconsidered if either grows significantly Fastifex 14:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The two types of minion covered in this article are so different and apparently un-related that the combination under a single heading seems forced and inadequate. The stub on minion as a "favorite" is sufficiently fleshed out to be a short article, and the subject matter is of sufficient historical importance and interest to stand alone. Lethiere 01:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. "[C]ombination under a single heading seems forced..." is a good way to put this. Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 06:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. Both are respectable stubs now. EdC 14:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikionary?

I'm not an expert, but this article now reads a lot to me like a dictionary article. It was less clear before the split. What exactly makes this a wikipedia article and not just a dictionary article?Mrjeff 10:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

The etymological stuff can be transwikied, but the historical ("Les Mignons") is encyclopaedic. That said, that should be under mignon, not minion. EdC 17:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007-04-13 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mignons?

While I can see "Les Mignons" might be wikipedia worthy, surely it should be at Mignons, or Les Mignons, not minion? Unless anyone comments in the next couple of days, I intend to copy that section to Mignon, then probably redirect this to the Minion disambigulation page.83.67.130.87 17:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

The section already exists at Les Mignons, so I'm redirecting this to the disambig page. --Xyzzyplugh 13:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)