Talk:Military law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been assessed as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
In the United States section...
Would it be biased to note that captured US military personnel have thus far only recieved torture, rape and summary execution from our current enemies, so any "impact" Bush's policies re: captured terrorists could have on their treatment after capture is moot?
This section should redirect to "Military Justice." "Military justice" is the term-of-art preferred in the English-speaking world, while "military law" is a misnomer.Posthoc777 12:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
