Talk:Miley Cyrus/Archive03

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between March 2007 and October 2007

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Please add new archives to Talk:Miley Cyrus/Archive04. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. --NrDg 01:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

Cleaning up

Due to incessant vandalism and nonsense, I've scrubbed the page and shoved it in an archive. For all new users, please read Talk page guidelines. In specific, we need to remember what a talk page is for.

A talk page is research for the article, and the policies that apply to articles also apply to talk pages. Research and debate should meet the same standards of verification, neutral point of view and no original research. There is reasonable allowance for speculation, suggestion and personal knowledge with a view to prompting further investigation, but it is a serious misuse of a talk page to continue to argue any point that has not met policy requirements.

-- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 14:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

No Picture???

The least you all can do is add a picture of Miley or Hannah on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.161.155 (talk)

If you could take a picture of her and put it under a free license, that would be great. The only problem is that a free picture has to be used, no copyrighted pictures are allowed. bibliomaniac15 02:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want a picture on here so badly, go take one of her and put it under a free license instead of complaining. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
That's quite enough. A picture WOULD enhance the article on Miley Cyrus - It helps to at least know what someone looks like. However, there are provisions for Fair Use in the international copyright laws, and those provisions have been used quite justly in other places on Wikipedia. I believe that a low-resolution image (say, less than 640*480) would be perfectly acceptable here. If anyone has an objection, maybe they should back it up instead of saying inflammatory things like the previous remark. Not ALL of us have access to celebrities to photograph, and those that DO are incredibly lucky. Now, please can we approach this situation realistically? Horst.Burkhardt 03:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Looks like the No Picture topic is out of date as there is a picture in there. I propose we remove it from the dicussion page as there are many other things about this article that need to be fixed/ammended.Wikistudnt 00:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

More about her myspace

Miley DOES have a myspace. It isn't a personal one, just her music myspace. It is official, because I am a member of MileyWorld and they confirmed it. So it is her official myspace page.[1] is her real myspace. Miley cyrus has a lot of things on it. Please see Links to be avoided. "Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace), discussion forums or USENET." If the myspace was the only official type site for her, I'd argue to add it. But as she has mileycyrus and mileyworld, they can cross link there. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 02:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Generally though, myspace links are allowed if they are official. This was discussed before, i forget where, but if its is a confirmed official myspace and not a fake, it is allowed to be added. But only if it can be confirmed to be official. Thats why they even have a template for adding myspace links! --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

If you can find where that's said ... it sounds suspiciously like one of those 'policy' arguments that isn't actually policy one way or another - and it's a link to normally be avoided, if it can be argued that it's good for this page, then let's do that. My concern is that even though it's official, we already have a link to Mileycyrus.com, which (should) link to it from there. That makes it (and mileyworld IMO) a child-site of the main official site. When do we become a link farm for all the official Miley places? She should be in charge of that. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 02:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree that this isn't a link farm, but if the site is official it should be linked. There are pages that have excessive links that aren't official. At least this site is run by her. I think someone should bring this up to the admins and see what their official verdict is on myspace links. We need to get an official policy to find out when it is acceptable, if ever, to have a link to a persons myspace. WP:EL says "Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject—and not prohibited by restrictions on linking—one should avoid", since it is official according to that it can be linked. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
But is her myspace page her official webpage or her official myspace page? There is a difference, and since she already has a domain name, I think this falls as the latter. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 03:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
It would be an official myspace page. WP:EL doesn't say it has to be their main website, only that it has to be an official page of the subject. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

It is her official myspace. Check mileycyrus.com and mileyworld.com and they will both confirm it. Polarbear400 21:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Where on mileycyrus.com is her myspace mentioned? --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions
Curiously the main page of Mileycyrus.com says
"IMPORTANT NOTICE: THERE ARE LOTS OF PEOPLE PRETENDING TO BE ME ON THE INTERNET!
MILEYCYRUS.com and MILEYWORLD.com ARE MY OFFICIAL WEBSITES AND THE ONLY PLACES
WHERE YOU CAN INTERACT WITH ME!"
Maybe it's not legit after all. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 20:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Maybe we should delete it then. I didn't see anywhere on about her having a myspace --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
that's her only official websites for her, but this is her official myspace, but you can't interact with her there. the myspace has been linked from her OFFICIAL pages aswell.. when she had the video asking people to vote for her dad. it's definitely ligit, so i think we should add it... 07:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC) User:124.190.192.58
No need! As you point out, it is already linked to from her official page. No need to make this article into a link farm. --Yamla 13:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Rephrasing?

Should the following be rephrased?

"Miley's faith is the "main thing" and is why she works in Hollywood,[6] and she attends church regularly with her family.[7]"

WAVY 10 22:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Do you have a proposal? We were trying to come to some sort of NPOV/middle ground about it. It's pretty much what she said (per the cited interviews). -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 13:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I just did a little work on it by rearranging the wording and emphasizing where the interviews in question took place. WAVY 10 22:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Grade Level?

Is Miley in 8th grade or 9th grade for 2006-2007? Her birthday is November 23, so it's before the cutoff (December 1st). But I know the California cutoff is different than some of the other states. New York is December 31, and some states are as early as July but I'm not sure about Tennessee. Stephe1987 05:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

the cutoff in California is December 5th so she could be in either. My birthday in in October and I'm in 9th but like I said, it could be either. Sparkle*fairy 23:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)sparklzzzz

Miley's in 9th grade!!! she said that herself that she went to the prom in her school along with EMILY OSMENT!

She would probably be in 9th grade, but it is hard to tell since she has a private tutor. Also, because she has a private tutor, I will ask permission to delete the above false statement.

The cutoff in Tennessee is September 30th. Her birthday is November 23, so it's AFTER the cutoff. Since she started school in Tennessee her grade level will be based on Tennessee rules putting her in grade 9 at the start of the upcoming school year. Cite "Education Commission of the States - Access to Kindergarten: Age Issues in State Statutes" http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=32. --NrDg 15:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The cutoff in Philadelphia, PA is aroudn September 5th i think. Or like before the school year starts, so i think it changes every year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.74.109 (talk) 20:23, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

She is in grade 9 now (2007-2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.219.131 (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Didn't she say at the Teen Choice Awards over the weekend something about testing into the 10th grade? WAVY 10 20:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes she did and it would be great to add to the article if we can find a reference for that fact. If you do add that fact it would need a {{fact}} tag. --NrDg 20:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
"Miley Cyrus shared a recent achievement: passing a test to allow her to study at 10th-grade level, though the Hannah Montana star should be in ninth grade." from USA Today 2007-08-26. --NrDg 15:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Overall: Correct format

I've noticed what appears to be the excessive use of the too-familiar "Miley" throughout this article. Were I writing this article, "young Cyrus" would have been my approach (see Wikipedia:Biographies of living people). - B.C.Schmerker 03:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Boyfriend

People magazine claims she has one in an interview with Billy Ray, and he says what he thinks about her boyfriend. Should we add this?? User:FendiCatz

Miley is currently not dating anyone, but I read that yes she did date Nick Jonas. I belive that she also did date Dylan Sprouse. Can anyone else verify this????
Yeah, I read that issue. It's the most recent one, and it's a reliable source. It says that she's dating Nick Jonas. Should we add it??
Since a 14 year old teenager's dating patterns are transitory and not serious, any reference to a relationship is just gossip, and should not be in this article. The article should reflect long-term relationships only. --NrDg 22:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
People magazine is a reliable source, since it is an official interview with them. I think we should add she is dating Nick Jonas. User:FendiCatz
I agree people magazine is a reliable source. All we know for certain, though, is that she was dating Nick Jonas at the time of the interview. That is the only fact we have. We cannot reliably know from that who she is dating now. That is my point about transitory information and why I don't think we should include this type of information in this article. --NrDg 05:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I know, but I'm guessing that interview is recent, isn't it? User:FendiCatz
It was probably fairly recent but it is still a snapshot in time. Do we want to put fast changing information in this article even when backed up with an impeccable source? Other impeccable sources such as recent interviews with Miley herself say things have changed from the information in the People article already. And she may change her mind again next week. We can't know current state of this type in information, nor do I think we should try to keep up with it. --NrDg 17:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I watched the Global Fan Summit with Miley Cyrus on June 27th, and she verified that Nick Jonas is a neighbor and good friend, but not a boyfriend. She states that she is looking for one though, with a grin.Molly Aster 23:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I saw an Entertainment Tonight interview with her Friday (July 6th), and she said...NO BOYFRIEND. WAVY 10 13:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok,I had enough of:"Should we put Miley Cyrus's boyfriend down in the article?" I deleted all of the talk pages saying they should add that.I will make this VERY clear.WE DON"T KNOW WHAT MILEY THINKS.IT'S GOSSIP.She could have one and protected her BF's life from reporters from saying she doesn't have a BF or whatever.Please STOP asking that.I will revert ANYTHING asking that question.Thank you. -- unsigned 22:52, 16 July 2007 UTC Mooncrest

I restored the deleted section. Please don't delete on-topic stuff from the discussion page. --NrDg 21:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I recently read an article, where her father says that she has a boyfriend who IS NOT famous. (Emphasized on not famous) But he also said she and Nick Jonas had been going on "group dates". Unintended Disaster 04:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I totally believe that miley is dating NICK JONAS because I saw a picture of Miley at a Wal mart store singing autographs in June. it was in san diego and on her right hand, she wrote in tiny handwriting "I heart Nick". if anybody can find that picture big enough to show it, then maybe we can add it in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.125.23.56 (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Read discussion above. A picture out of context is meaningless. --NrDg 22:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Vegetarian?

Anybody wanna look for anything to prove that? WAVY 10 13:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I doubt she is but, yeah you should try to verify it. Unintended Disaster 04:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Miley Isnt a vegatarian i saw a pic of her biting into to a burger kinger whopper —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.228.16 (talk) 20:49, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

She eats McNuggets. It said it on mileycyrus.com a few months ago. Yinyang1195 03:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

ON TOUR WITH THE JONAS BROTHERS

According to the latest interview with the Jonas Brothers they are NOT confirmed as an opening act. http://www.tommy2.net/content/intjonasbrothers3.php

Tour has been confirmed. --NrDg 17:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Discography

I disagree with removing this section to a separate article. I see no practical reason for a separate article and I think the information about Miley Cyrus belongs in one place. --NrDg 19:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I received no justification of the split so unsplit the contents back to the main article page. There is not enough music released by Miley Cyrus to justify a separate Discography page.--NrDg 22:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Tonight show with Miley Cyrus.

This video: <Deleted link due to contributory copyright violation --NrDg 22:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC) > Miley Cyrus on the Tonigt Show is/not a copyright video because it's edited & it's still on YouTube. It Should have been removed otherwise so I so no reason to not put it.

I've even told NBC about this link & they've done nothing.

So I so no other reason to Not have it. If you do then please reply.

--Kanonkas 18:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

NBC and CBS sometimes upload content on YouTube themselves. Also, I think NBC is the most lenient of the networks when it comes to stuff uploaded on the site. WAVY 10 18:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Basic guidelines for Wikipedia or what Wikipedia is not "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files". This type of material does not belong. Also just because NBC chooses not to now enforce its copyright does not mean it will not in the future. This type of thing is too transitory over and above the fact that it is not appropriate for Wikipedia in the first place. --NrDg 18:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Restrictions_on_linking is pretty explicit about NOT linking to sites like youtube. This is not a guideline, put wikipedia policy about contributory infringement of copyright. --NrDg 18:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
As I said, the movie is Edited It's not Direct taken from NBC. I spoke to the man/lady who uploaded it & trust me. NBC takes all the links I report but this one they did not. They're Very hard on copyright videos, 1 hour later or something & you're video is most like to have been removed if I need to take more actions then I will, like this time talk to them on Phone hopefully then they will give us a answer. If I have in any reason not seen what you've said & you've said it then please tell me that too. --Kanonkas 18:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
This video was NOT posted by NBC and it is obvious copyright infringement. It is against Wikipedia policy to post the link so please don't. It would take a notice by NBC on the video description itself permitting it for it not to be copyright infringement. The fact that NBC has not chosen to have this removed does not indicate EXPLICIT permission for it to be there. EXPLICIT permission is what Wikipedia requires. Read the Policy link above. --NrDg 18:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Again, I've Not said that NBC has uploaded this video & I removed my link as we know & since then I haven't put it back on so I know that. Yes it does, YouTube remove all kind of videos, mostly, if they're about The TonightShow & it has been reported before, the YouTube staff are taking care of copyright most of the time but because it was not Direct from the Show it hasn't been removed. I've read the external Link Wiki, as I said it's NOT copyrighted.

EXPLICIT permission for it to be there by NBC. So we need to contact them, how? --Kanonkas 19:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Irrelevant whether or not it is an extract of the show or the whole show. It does not meet the fair use exemption for copyright so the whole video is a copyright violation. It is an obvious copyright violation to anyone viewing it. Look, Wikipedia takes this copyright stuff pretty seriously as it becomes liable as well if we link to this type of stuff. Most of Wiki rules are actually guidelines but this one is NOT. Wiki WILL ban users for breaking this rule so don't push it unless you are ABSOLUTELY certain that you don't break it. Contact NBC if you wish but understand that the YouTube video description itself MUST have a release on it from NBC allowing it to be there. NBC is not going to do this. They may not care but they are not going to give the explicit permission that Wikipedia requires. Don't waste you time.--NrDg 19:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
So what you're saying (You've said it before) NBC have to upload this video then it's fine to have the link here? I doubt they'll even care doing that to be honest. --Kanonkas
Either NBC would have to upload it OR the uploader would need NBC permission, and be able to prove they have it, before we could use it. Wikipedia really likes to err on the side of being REALLY REALLY sure they don't link copyright violations.--NrDg 19:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Okay, so how is he/she going to get NBC permission? By mailing them? Please reply back.--Kanonkas 19:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

It is up to the uploader to figure this out. If they can't get it a verifiably provable form then they are continuing to break copyright. If they can't prove to us that they have NBC's permission, we can't use it. From everything I know, if NBC wanted this video on the net, they would have posted it themselves on their own web site. That said, NBC will not give permission to some YouTube uploader no matter how you approach them. There is no benefit to NBC so they won't do it. --NrDg 19:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I doubt the uploader cares to be honest, anyway I sent them a E-Mail their is probs a lot of wrong

grammar because I was in a hurry. Here it is:

"On YouTube their is a video with the Tonight Show where Miley Cyrus is on the Show, the video is not DIRECT from the Tonight Show but that doesn't matter so much.

Video: <Deleted link due to contributory copyright violation --NrDg 22:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC) >

Anyway can we have permission to have the video on YouTube? Because we at WikiPedia wants to use the link & the movie would help people & maybe think, people would want to watch NBC because it seems very nice & so on. So this video is kinda helping you too. Further, please contact us back on my mail & then you can tell the uploader "Tipmybro"--Kanonkas 20:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I got reply! This is what they said "Dear Jason Thanks for your email. NBC values your comments. Please check our FAQ section to see other answers. Unfortunately it looks like this video violates NBC rules. Our copyright expert team are going to look on this video when they have time. We will send you a new E-Mail with further information." Aww.. That's life lol, but I'm going to still wait for a new reply, they haven't confirmed that it is violating NBC's rules.

Their is no reason to have the discussion, it's pointless. I can really talk to them on phone & get it but I won't because it's just a little thing. --Kanonkas 22:12 (UTC)
Still need something that we can ALL verify as permission. Oral permission to you will not work. Also please don't delete comments in the talk page. --NrDg 22:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Fine, I don't bother having not true stuff on this talk page, you really think you get a reply from NBC from their mail? You can dream & I haven't even done it. It was the the Uploader who did it but I don't care whatever you want to do. Like the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments Talklines are saying, sorry. --Unsigned by Kanonkas 22:23 (UTC)

International Tour?

I don't care that much but some editors seem to. The tour starting in Oct 2007 is classed as a North American tour as there is at least one stop in Canada. I believe that this also makes it an international tour as Miley IS performing in an other country. Since there is at least one editor who strongly disagrees and I don't care that much I say we just leave this out of the article. --NrDg 17:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Last I checked, if she preforms in more than one country, it's international. To the editor who commented about it not being international because she doesn't preform in Europe, you're wrong. Preforming in Europe would make it intercontinental as well as international. But she can still perform in Canada, US and Mexico with it being international. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
It must be noted that I live in Canada so I am certainly not anti-Canadian (nobody has alleged this). It is technically an international tour but the reality is that almost every single show is in the U.S. As such, I think it is slightly misleading to label it as international. Technically true (and whoever added that was clearly acting in good faith) but I think it is safest simply not to add that information to the article. It's not meaningfully international and doesn't add anything to the article. --Yamla 17:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it is that important on HOW we classify the tour. I originally put in the international part to try to placate the person who seemed to want it. I think it could be notable that this will be her second concert outside the US with the first being in London, the second in Toronto. Probably some Toronto newspaper will make note of this and when it does we can use that as a reference if we need to. We can probably put in that one of the tour cities is Toronto based on the current cite. --NrDg 18:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Added the North American part as this is part of the description in the press release.--NrDg 18:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Who come she is not coming to Europe she has only been to Europe Once

You'd have to ask her, this is an encyclopedia rather than a chat forum. --Yamla 15:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Weight

Does anybody know how much she weighs? It IS relevant, because many people concentrate on how fat or thin people are, so if anybody knows, please post it . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.129.35.199 (talk) 09:15:34, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Why would that be relevant and what would the purpose be for an actress/singer's weight for an encyclopedia (versus an athlete, for instance; personally I doubt the importance of mentioning someone's weight in an encyclopedia...period!) WAVY 10 13:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I removed talk discussions about this. It does not belong in either the article or in the discussion page and speculation about it is a WP:BLP violation.--NrDg 15:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
UNACCEPTABLE. It is a violation of wiki rules to delete other people's contributions unless you have a extremely good reason (and in this case, you did not). "It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct typing errors, grammar, etc. Do not strikeout the comments of other editors without their permission. Never edit someone's words to change their meaning." I know you didn't ask my permission to censor my contribution, and I'd guess you didn't ask Unintended Disaster either. This is NOT acceptable behavior to randomly delete people's Talk contributions without first asking them if it is okay. - Theaveng 09:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
As per WP:BLP "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space. This is not just a recommendation, this is Wikipedia official policy. That is why the material is being removed (again). Please don't put it back. --NrDg 13:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

It's really not important for the article, but I'd say it's questionable as a BLP violation at best. --Onorem♠Dil 13:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I, obviously disagree. See the quote from the WP:BLP article above about "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material". The material I removed was unsourced AND contentious. What was left was not. --NrDg 13:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Bit of a weird question but oh well. I did see a video of her once at the Over The Hedge premiere and the question asked was "what is one thing your fans don't know?". Miley answered that she weighed 100 pounds. That was a while a go, but that's the only thing I know about this topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.193.237 (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Reason for Poor Performance on Hot 100?

When I came here, I noticed Hannah/Miley's songs peaked at 25 on the Hot 100. That's surprising because even as an adult, I think some of her songs are good enough to hit or approach number 1. Is there a reason for the low peformance? For example, can we cite an article that states, "Hannah/Miley's song are not played on maintream top 40 stations," or something similar? - Theaveng 09:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Sure put it in, if you want to, as there are news article from reliable sources that discuss this very issue. --NrDg 13:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Pregnancy hoax

Is she really pregnant? we should post this!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.153.116.11 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

there are spelling mistakes in the pregnancy hoax section of the article. i would change it if i could but it's protected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.133.169.140 (talk) 00:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn't see any. WAVY 10 01:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
oh yes. "The real stoy on J-14's Page 16 magazine was about 'Miley's Gross Habits' told by her co-stars on the set of Hannah Montana."
'stoy' is a real word!! i'm sorry. i forgot about that!
You really should read the article BEFORE you post a question about this hoax in the talk page. The hoax is being addressed in the article but needs better cites. The hoax meets the notability requirement as it has been reported and debunked in numerous highly reliable sources. --NrDg 23:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

what's her religion?

whar's her religion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russian12 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

What is known is in the article right now. There is no reference to the church they attend. --NrDg 15:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Her mom stated that she wears a clarity ring. So that might tell her religion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.145.159.58 (talk) 13:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
It's a purity ring. It implies no details on religious affiliation. --NrDg 13:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus is Christian, goes to church, and her parents try to keep her Christian. So, she is Christian.

Age

Didn't know where to put this but... For The Record, how old is Miley Cyrus? I've heard she was 14, she was 16, some reports said she was 18. How old is she? BigBoi29 18:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)BigBoi29

You've got to be kidding. Did you even read the main article? For the record, the information in the main article has good references and is correct.--NrDg 18:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I do remember an article where Hannah Montana was first announced two years ago and somebody at USA Today mistakenly gave her age as 22. (Notice I said it probably was a mistake). WAVY 10 19:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Her age... is 14 she is turning 15 this year (2007) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.233.98 (talk) 01:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Why disambig template??

Why is there a disambig template on miley cyrus article??? the article is abt miley and i think it shd be about her....i suggest that we remove from this article the disambig link to hannah montana. any comments???.....Gprince007 15:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree. It serves no purpose. --NrDg 16:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
i agree as well. rollerracer —Preceding unsigned comment added by rollerracer/ ) 16:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


New Picture

I suggest we get a new picture of Miley this picture of her has been here for almost a year. --rollerracer 16:03, October 18 2007(UTC)

Easier said than done. It took us half a year or so to get that pic. Besides, the picture is meant to give a visual representation of her. Right now it has only been a year or less old, so it's pretty much accurate. bibliomaniac15 23:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

NO MOVIE

her movie, the babysitting one is being canceled according to J-14, the newest issue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.226.186.217 (talk) 21:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)