Talk:Mike Freeman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary on the comment page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. | ||
- That link doesn't seem to work for me, however a brief summary of the article can be found here: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-148948.html. He wasn't fired from the job. He admitted lying about having a degree, accepted full responsibility for his bad act and resigned the position before he actually started working.. it made the press, but until this article is expanded with other details about his career, this incident really shouldn't be the "highlight" of our article about him.. this single act isn't what defines his career or his character. --Versageek 00:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
--216.152.180.40 (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] fix link
Could you fix the "1961 births" link. It is currently linking to the last name "Mike" instead of "Freeman". I'd do it, but this article is locked. - Bcc cindy (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
{{Editprotected}}
Please add {{DEFAULTSORT:Freeman, Mike}}, so the article sorts correctly within its categories. Thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
In reference to Mike's career not being reflected by his lying to the star, most of what people want written is his reception. Why doesn't Wikipedia allow criticism of Freeman, after all he is very controversial. http://www.poynter.org/dg.lts/id.45/aid.86372/column.htm Mike Freeman has negativity follow him, which is an indicator of his career. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arhat79 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This is very typical of arhat who has stalked Freeman for some time. Arhat is self-righteous and frequently wrong. He is also somewhat stupid, as noted by his rampant spelling and grammatical errors. Arhat is a loser so why should we listen to him?
It should also be noted that in addition to being a loser, arhat is also a flaming racist. Wikipedia should know that arhat goes by the name bradymania on cbssports.com and has posted some of the most racist garbage you will ever see. Freeman's race is the crux of arhat's stalking and no other reason.
I challenge you to show anything that I have ever written that is racist. This reeks of typical Freeman race baiting. I actually have a degree in a hard science. Mike, what was your degree in? Why do you love censorship so much? Could it be that you are tired of being criticised? Before you start writing about my spelling or grammatical errors why don't you start proofreading your articles, after all they are the most poorly written "pieces of journalism" that can be found on the internet.
I'm not Freeman. I am a supporter. You, on the other hand, are a still a redneck fascist. You're the biggest stalker racist in cyberspace. My degree is in law and I find it hard to believe you have a degree since you spell like you're drunk and high. Please check your spelling, stalker redneck, of the word "criticized." You call other people idiots while you can't spell. Oh, and you still haven't posted your real name so I can check out your background. Loser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.223.198.156 (talk) 20:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.177.193 (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
