Talk:Midlothian, Virginia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Midlothian, Virginia article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Naming of Midlothian

The origins of the Name should include a link to Bettie Weaver's book, where I think that story originally came from, although I think Weaver herself may have said there is no conclusive evidence. 68.57.110.172 22:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)J.F.K. III

I find this story a bit implausible since there is also a place in Scotland actually called Midlothian. It seems more likely this place was named after Midlothian itself than that people "compromised" between West and East Lothian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.109.56.162 (talk) 00:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 21st Century: Growth issues rule

It appears to me that only the very early parts of the 21st Century will have to deal with the issue of growth as the remaining part will have to deal with the issue of paucity and escalating costs of fossil fuels used to power the sprawling infrastructure.

[edit] Watersheds

The entire Watersheds subtopic needs to be sited or removed. While the information may be truthful, or partially so, the section is ripe with uncited "facts". The conclusion is clearly outside of NPOV guidelines and should be changed or removed.Monk 01:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)