Talk:Middle Temple

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject London, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to London. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

	Middle Ages Portal Middle Temple is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
	Crusades task force
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

I cut the statement "where barristers receive their training". I presume that was meant to refer to MT rather than the RCJ, but in either case it's not really true. Training is a fairly minor part of MT's activities. Markalexander100 03:52, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I have been a member of the MT since 1980 and I have no recollection of the provision of subsidised accommodation. Is there a source for this statement? --ukexpat 18:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Added - the MT website. Bencherlite 19:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photos

I removed the photos request. Do we now have enough photos? - The Blackfriar 13:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Logical Contradiction

This page describes the Middle Temple as a "Royal Peculiar"; however, that wiki page says it is an extra-diocesan (but not Royal) Peculiar. I have no idea which is correct, but they can't both be. Could someone clarify and fix that? Thanks. Msalt (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The article Extra-parochial_area also refers to it as a Royal Peculiar. And obviously we want tne Inner_Temple article to correspond.Msalt (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)