Talk:Microsoft BizTalk Server

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Neutality / Commercialism in edits regarding MS & Cisco certification

See the Microsoft Certified Professional talk page why this article is tagged. --ddezeure 14:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed the reference to Windows Workflow Foundation because 206 R2 does not implement WF inside BizTalk Server. --Trayburn 18:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advertisement/Press release-like style

This page reads like a product brochure. It presents a mountain of unsubstantiated claims ("easy integration", "popular among small businesses"). It has no "criticisms" section and makes no mention of ANY drawbacks the product has. PR spam is a big problem on Wikipedia owing to our high Google pagerank - pages like this are frequently targetted by PR companies as a free billboard. I'm adding the advertisement and sources tags. Kwertii 20:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't agree, it really doesn't looks like an advertisement, I think some 'citation needed' would solve the problem. The article is also too poor to be an advertisement. --Rodrigostrauss 12:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What?

Although bipin targeted to medium to large enterprises

What is bipin? Is that supposed to be "being"?--WPaulB (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit. I had time to go through the history to day and foudn that it was nonsense inserted by a repeated-vandalism IP.--WPaulB (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)