Talk:Microdermabrasion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why does the link
keep getting removed?
It's riddled with ads, the grammar and spelling are terrible, and it only promotes one chain of salons. It's a badly-done ad.
[edit] This whole article is nonsense
It's basically promoting quack treatments of acne and scar removal.
Utter rubbish, yes there are quacks doing this but true professionals get good and even excellent results. It is one of the most popular treatments of the last few years so I doubt it would be that popular if it did not get the results!
[edit] Future Additions
I have some photographs of before and after (microdermabrasioninfo4u.com) I would like to add the photo of the eyelids as this shows what expectations you should have.
A section on results may be worth attempting as many salons have fake photographs and create false hopes?
[edit] Planned Clean
The first paragraph under Microdermabrasion Techniques is ridiculous - firstly the two methods mentioned are not unique? Also the cause of pimples mentioned is ridiculous as there is much more to this problem than dead skin cells. There are other areas that are similar.
