Talk:Michael Zorc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Notability

Not only did he play in, and win, the Champions League, but http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Zorc suggests he has been successful elsewhere (I don't speak German, so can't translate it). KeithD 23:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

No offence - but should you be writing an article for wikipedia if you can't read the language in which the source material is written? andy 23:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

None taken. However, it wasn't the source for writing the article. My source was the UEFA Champions League 1996-97 article. I was simply ensuring that everyone who had won one of the biggest prizes in football didn't have a red link on Wikipedia. I realise it's only a stub at this stage, but that's not the same as not being a notable person. KeithD 23:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. But why not leave the red link as an encouragement to someone who can write a real article about it? Anyway, if you want to mark it as a stub I'm happy to agree that it should be kept, if no-one else objects. andy 23:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I've expanded the article a little, it's one I'd been meaning to do anyway. ArtVandelay13 16:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)