Talk:Michael Levin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

lkjytjkg?

Just vandalism, now removed. RossPatterson 04:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

His article, "The Case for Torture" was published long before the current terrorism scare and 9/11. There should be some nod to that effect so the article isn't confusing to readers. The current link to the essay might be misleading. --Elecid 03:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)68.175.53.205 (talk)

Professor Michael Levin has never, as far as I can tell, claimed that homosexuality is immoral. I can find no reference for this attribution, and Professor Levin disputes it in an e-mail I sent to him on 30 November 2007. He has, in "Why Homosexuality is Abnormal" (1985, The Monist) and again in "Non-Euclidean Sex" (Think, Jan. 2006) claimed that homosexuality "homosexuality...is a misuse of bodily parts and is consequently less satisfying that heterosexual sex." If there are no immediate objections I will edit the article to read as above. I disagree strongly with Professor Levin's position, but I think it is important to get the position right. --C. A. Evans, Ph.D. Student in Philosophy, CUNY Graduate Center.

Again, as far as I can tell, Professor Levin has never claimed that white people are superior to black people. He has claimed that white people have an on average higher IQ and that there is good evidence that this difference is genetic as opposed to environmental. I will edit the article to express this point if there are no objections. --C. A. Evans, Ph.D. Student in Philosophy, CUNY Graduate Center —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.53.205 (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Is this article still stub quality? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.96.105.154 (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

American Renaissance is a racialist magazine as it states in its Wikipedia entry. I am changing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RG415WBFA (talk • contribs) 08:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)