Talk:Michael Collins Piper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phew, I dunno if it's disputed. Listen to one of those programs, they are anti-Semitic. Now, anti-Semitic in it's connotation rather than denotation is up for dispute. TKE 01:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Is he making it a racial issue (wherein he makes statements of negative characteristics, even ideologies and abberant subjects, like criminals, as geneticly inherant traits)? That is what I would have as a criteria for classifying him as Anti-Semitic. -- 69.248.43.27 09:57. 4 June 2006

Michael Collins Piper should continue with his work.This is America.We have freedom of speech.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nordwave (talk • contribs) .

Amen. IdeArchos 23:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

"Nordwave, the Euro-American Racialist Newsletter ..." A White Nationalist Racialist Organization, part of the Aryan Nations movement - heavily involved in anti-Semitism (among a whole host of other forms of bigotry and prejudice) supports Piper. Which is no surprise for anyone who has read Piper’s addled, paranoid and deeply twisted version of reality. Yes, we do have freedom of speech in the US. We also have the right to accurately describe demigogues and crazies for what they are. The Wik entry is too complementary and does not do justice to the rubbish espoused by Piper. 71.76.38.68 22:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

If that is the case (in regards to Piper), then how do you explaine some of this exchange between him and Mark Glenn 44 minutes into his August 22nd broadcast?

Here you can obvioussly hear him speaking derogatively about the supremacist, and even to some extent, seperatist movements for denying the participation of non-whites such as Glenn, Heshem Talawi, Matthias Chang, and other assorted Arab and Asian authors. - 68.32.201.254 13:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gay?

Following their falling out Chris Bollyn has alleged Piper is homosexual and dating someone called 'Phil'. Bollyn has also stated that his real name is Michael B. Piper. Does Bollyn qualify as a credible source in this instance?