Talk:Mereological essentialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Metaphysics Logic

I don´t agree that the remark about an increduolus stare at the defender of mereological essentialism is a overly biased sentence. The point is that ME is considered as a too absurd position, but if it has other theoretical benefits it should be defended. The situation is the same as with David Lewis´ defence of concrete possible worlds. The increduolus stare attitude is, for instance, defended, not explicitly, by Peter van Inwagen and Trenton Merricks. RickardV 10:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)