Talk:Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I have merged the content from the separate articles for the books in the series (all of which were stubs) into this article. More detail on the 2nd and 3rd books in the series might be a good idea. DES 30 June 2005 15:38 (UTC)

[edit] Updates to Pages associated with the series

I've made some additions and revisions to the main page, and I plan on continuing to expand and improve the article however possible.

Mainly, though, I'd like to draw everyone's attention to the newly crafted articles on the three individual books in the series (The Dragonbone Chair, Stone of Farewell, and To Green Angel Tower). I did the best I could, but I feel that all of them could use improvements and additions to the plot summaries. If you can, please improve them as necessary. - Runch 04:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Is it really necessary to have separate articles for each book? This is a trilogy and one big story, after all. --dllu 21:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings, the Wheel of Time, and various other series are also just "one big story." Sometimes, however, the "one big story" can have sufficient need to be split apart when it comes to discussing and describing them. I think this series is a reasonable candidate for such a decision. --Brandon (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)