From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of arthropods. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|

 |
Melittosphex burmensis is part of WikiProject Myanmar (Burma), a project to improve all Burma related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Burmese-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance for this Project's importance scale. |
|
[edit] Description in Science
The species will be described in the November 3, 2006 Science, but I do not know the dating conventions for that journal, so cannot cite it properly at this time. Perhaps someone can fill in once the journal is released?
[edit] Low importance?
Sorry, don't buy the idea that the first fossil record of bees is low importance. Larry Dunn 17:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Every lineage has a first specimen, so while indeed, bees are important, this is an intersting fossil, but is not of such great importance. It's an interesting scientific curiosity, but apart from extending the fossil record of bees back a bit, it doesn't bring about any fundamental changes to our understanding of the world. There are a ahell of a lot of insect species, and it takes more than this (in my opinion) to warrant anything other than low-importance. --Stemonitis 12:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)