Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/fvw
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.
[edit] fvw
With the ArbCom election, the mediation committee has lost a number of good people, and I do feel it's important for there to be sufficient choice of mediators for editors seeking mediation. Therefor I'm nominating myself, and should there not be significant objection, I hope to contribute to this sometimes overlooked but important part of wikipedia dispute resolution. To preempt Ambi's question, no I haven't been involved in any major conflict resolution on wikipedia, only the odd "Don't you think you should reconsider that" or "could you have a look at this or that guideline". Though I understand this makes it difficult to predict my performance (and I'll take no offence at any objections), I do think I am capable of helping opposing parties come to a compromise, and if nothing else at least my ability to remain civil and communicative should be apparant from my edit history. So far I've been most active in RC-patrol and cleanup, and I'd like to work on this side of wikipedia too. I'm a reasonably new editor, but I am familiar with the way DispRes works and the community of wikipedia. --fvw* 21:41, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
Mediation committee:
- Unsure, but not necessarily opposing, since Fvw is still fairly new. Angela. 15:01, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Ditto Angela. Neutralitytalk 00:54, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Too new, I think. Not opposing though Andre (talk) 08:46, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Ditto others. Ambi 01:37, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too new and inexperienced. Danny 15:16, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Outside opinions:
In interests of full fairness and not as a slight to fvw, I present Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fvw. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:55, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- See my statement above under Snowspinner's application. --Michael Snow 22:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I believe Fvw recently had a RFA opposed on his newness which was possibly an okay decision(Nevermind he is an admin!). He does seem to have commitment to Wikipedia and wants to help in some way. I see no reason why he wouldn't do a good job here as a mediator. I suggest to the Committee that you support him. You'll probably see he'll do a good job and he'll most certainly not do a bad job. So, I urge you to support his nomination.
- The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.

