Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-24 Michel Thomas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mediation Cabal
2006-08-24 Michel Thomas
Article michel thomas
Status Closed
Requestor Facts@mt.org
Mediator(s) Addhoc
Comment Probably close soon, as not within our remit.


Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-08-24 Michel Thomas

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Facts@mt.org 16:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
...Michel Thomas article
Who's involved?
...Roy Rivenburg, et al.
What's going on?
...What I would call an edit war, perhaps inaccurately.
What would you like to change about that?
...Possible to bar or restrict Rivenburg from further edits?
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
Yes, email me at facts@michelthomas.org

[edit] Mediator response

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.

Not sure if this is really the sort of request the mediation-cabal would be able to handle. The principal aim of "to bar or restrict Rivenburg from further edits" isn't part of the mediation-cabal's remit. Possibly would suggest looking at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes to review alternative strategies. In this context, I would suggest this case should be closed. Addhoc 13:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)