From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Beginning of the End
With regard to your comments on Talk:Puerto Rico: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 22:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
NOVEMBER 18, 2007
After carefully analyzing the progression and development of Puerto Rico Wiki Page, WE have concluded that it has been a FLAGRANT project to UNDERMINE the EXPLOITATION of POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY by:
with, but not limited to:
- A False Portrayal and Impression of Puerto Rico
- Distorted and Garbled Language Styles
- No Insight about the Real Culture and Social Situation of Puerto Rico
- No Enlightenment about the Education Status of Puerto Rico
- Article Format Incertitude: Jumbled Structure and Disordered Composition
- Unacceptable, Impetuous, Amateurish and Atrocious Article Hierarchy
- Poor Copy Writing
- Reversed Political Propaganda represented with the point of view of several individuals writing this article to vindicate and exonerate the point of views of other Wikipedians.
(Media Cop (talk) 23:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC))
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "The purpose of Wikepedia is to EDUCATE every GENERATION with FREE THOUGHT, KNOWLEDGE and INTELLIGENCE, not SPECULATION or POINT OF VIEWS COMING FROM SEVERAL POLITICAL PARTY FANATICS. In this case, 3 individuals. Please revert to the New Version of the Puerto Rico Article; the Past Version was Confusing, Polarizing, Partisan and full of Bafflement."
Decline reason: "For one thing, you are autoblocked. Please follow the linked instructions. Second thing, do not SHOUT. — Kurykh 23:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.
original block message
We need the actual block message, containing the blocking admin and your IP address to be able to locate your block — -- lucasbfr talk 01:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
- Caribbean~H.Q. 01:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.
original block message
You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Unblock
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I was blocked again by the same people (a group of several individuals monopolizing the entrance of other wikepedians into the article)
Such is the case regarding a possible hoax: Puerto Rico (board game) They keep deleting my comments on the article's talk page which reads:
* Article reads like a hoax or blatant advertising from a company (Non-Notable)
* Article needs Factual References from well-known established Publications (Including Germany, Canada and United States)
* References and Footnotes Required
* www.boardgamegeek.com is not a reliable source; it is written like a blog
* www.rainydaygames.ca is not a reliable source; it is written like a blog
* www.aleaspiele.de/Pages/A7/ is not a reliable source; it is written like a blog
* At least one article from the New York Times and three from other prominent/respected sources in the United States including Puerto Rico"
Decline reason: "This does not address the reason for your block which is violations of WP:SOCK. — Yamla (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.
original block message
You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
