Talk:Mediterranean Fleet (United Kingdom)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mediterranean Fleet (United Kingdom) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. B rated as B-Class on the assessment scale High rated as high-importance on the assessment scale This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force

[edit] Tables

It always amazes me that when you go to the trouble of formatting a table so that it displays properly, people come along, get rid of align and width codes, and spell out the months so they take more space, with the result that it displays much worse on most machines, and they think they have made it better.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

The dates were not formatted properly at all (day month and year within the same double brackets). The refs were also grouped rather than separate. Once all of the content has been sorted, it is then possible to go back to widths and checking the tidyness of the display. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)