Talk:Meadows and Lake Kathleen Railroad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Meadows and Lake Kathleen Railroad article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the Mapneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this map request.
This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon.
To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week.
Stub This page is rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article is rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Talk:Meadows and Lake Kathleen Railroad/archive

[edit] Recent changes

All of the recent changes to the article have destroyed the formatting. Please see the Wikipedia Manual of Style to see how articles are formatted. I think it would be more useful to revert back to the version as of November 1 and add back in the changes from there. I would also like to point out the Wikipedia policy WP:OWN, which might apply in this case. All the stub tags, categories, etc. are there to enable other editors and users to easily find and improve this article, and I suggest that unless it can be argued that they were inappropriate, they be restored. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and does have definite guidelines. Other editors are making legitimate suggestions about the article's content and it would be nice to create a dialogue on this page. Thanks! Katr67 22:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:M&LKlogo2.jpg

Image:M&LKlogo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)