Talk:McDonaldland

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result of this discussion was Merge

It has been two weeks (or 2 years) since this proposal was made and no one has said any thing against it. I will begin the merge today. Only three statements in two years, I guess that is the way it is sometimes.

- Jeremy (Jerem43 17:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC))

Would anyone object strongly to merging the characters from McDonaldland (except Ronald) back to this page?--nixie 01:54, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

None here; my only comment to it is that we should make sure to make the existing stubbed articles about the characters into redirects. — THOR 16:16, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I just tagged the article as needing a merge with the character pages, I got to the talk page and found out that it was proposed already two years ago. I guess I wasn't the only one to think of this, that make sense.

Reasons for merger:

1. Besides Ronald, the individual characters' articles are all stubs and they really would fit in the main body of this article;
2. Most of the material in the articles is duplicated across the various article, primarily the information about the streamlining done in the 1980's;
3. In several of these articles more than half is a trivia section;
4. Many of the minor character articles consist only a single or pair of paragraphs;
5. The Kroft's lawsuit is mentioned in several articles that are all about the same topic.

I am going to contact the editors about the two posts from 2005 and see if the are still of the same mind.

- Jeremy (Jerem43 06:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

I posted this on their talk pages :

==McDonaldland merger==

Hello,
In 2005 you posted to the McDonaldland talk pages about a proposed merge of the individual characters' pages into the main body of the McDonaldland article. I cannot see if this was ever done and I have recently proposed the same.

If you would like to comment on this, please check out the McDonaldland characters merge discussion.

- Jeremy (Jerem43 07:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

Support I put the reasons in the proposal - Jeremy (Jerem43 07:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

• Cheers on the follow-up, and I still support an appropriate merge. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 11:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.