Talk:Maybe You've Been Brainwashed Too

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe You've Been Brainwashed Too was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Delisted version: Error: invalid time

To-do list for Maybe You've Been Brainwashed Too:	edit · history · watch · refresh
Add a paragraph or two on how the album fits in the development of music. Remove subjective interpretation of each track.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh) Article requirements: Y All the start class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y Categorisation at least by artist and year Y A casual reader should learn something about the album.Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Delisted GA

This article no longer complies with the Good Article criteria, more specifically, the part of the criteria dealing with Neutrality. When it was passed back in February it seems, I don't think we even had criteria.....but the point is, we do now, and look at your section on songs. It is compleatly filled with unsourced quality judgements, a theme i've noticed in almost every single article related to musicians or bands, and I don't know if people just want to be music critics or what, but if you must be a music critic here, you should know that is not a Neutral point of view in terms of Wikipedia's policies. Homestarmy 01:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:New-radicals Mother.jpg

Image:New-radicals Mother.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)