User talk:Mavericstud1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Michaelbusch 02:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 02:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Supermanreturns044.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supermanreturns044.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tina Small requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget.talk 16:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tina Small

I think the significance of the subject has been established. The article just needs sources. Please add sources to the article. Otherwise, the article could be deleted. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:184962.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:184962.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 22:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:06m.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:06m.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 22:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria

A tag has been placed on Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eatcacti (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Eatcacti (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thongor of Lemuria

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thongor of Lemuria, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/thongorlemuria.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Thongor of Lemuria, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/thongorlemuria.htm. As a copyright violation, Thongor of Lemuria appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Thongor of Lemuria has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Thongor of Lemuria and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Thongor of Lemuria with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Thongor of Lemuria.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Vgranucci (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.barbariankeep.com/bios.html. As a copyright violation, Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Day of the Stranger: Further Memories of Robert E. Howard.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --CWY2190TC 03:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] One Who Walked Alone

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of One Who Walked Alone, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.barbariankeep.com/bios.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, One Who Walked Alone, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.barbariankeep.com/bios.html. As a copyright violation, One Who Walked Alone appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. One Who Walked Alone has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:One Who Walked Alone and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:One Who Walked Alone with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:One Who Walked Alone.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ArglebargleIV (talk) 04:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/thongorlemuria.htm. As a copyright violation, Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Thongor and The Wizard of Lemuria.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tina Small

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tina Small, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why I removed edits to The Land That Time Forgot (film)

Your edits to The Land That Time Forgot (film) have been removed because of rampant copyright violations. Please see the talk page for a detailed listing.

Please stop copying copyrighted text into Wikipedia articles, it's a violation of Wikipedia policy as well as the original writers' copyrights. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Why I removed edits to At the Earth's Core (film)

Your edits to At the Earth's Core (film) have been removed because of rampant copyright violations. Please see the talk page for a detailed listing.

Again, please stop copying copyrighted text into Wikipedia articles, it's a violation of Wikipedia policy as well as the original writers' copyrights. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I've reverted your most recent edits to At the Earth's Core (film). Wikipedia isn't the place to post your own opinions or reviews of movies (or anything else, for that matter). Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, summarizes other writings, it's not an outet for original essays or reviews. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Original research for a good explanation of what I mean. thanks, -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 03:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Michaelbusch (talk) 03:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeatedly reposting material in violation of the copyright of others and incorporating original research, and blanking a page after being warned to cease and desist from the aforementioned behavior. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not vandalize

The edit you made to Bill Ward (cartoonist) here constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize. Your IP, as you can see, has been tracked, and further such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from editing.-- Tenebrae (talk) 04:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media ({{{1}}})

Thanks for uploading [[:{{{1}}}]]. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alycia Lane

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alycia Lane, you will be blocked from editing. Rollosmokes (talk) 16:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Only warning

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ka-Zar, you will be blocked from editing. Based on your contribution and warning history, I think there's sufficient reason to give you an only warning template.WLU (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 00:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Busty Dusty, you will be blocked from editing. Tabercil (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)