Talk:Matthew Stevens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Snooker, an attempt to improve Wikipedia's coverage of snooker. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

Find sources: Matthew Stevens snookernews, books, scholar


Contents

[edit] Pundit talk

I'm removing this:

"Upon reaching the final of the snooker World Championship in 2000, former professional Willie Thorne said that he did not think Stevens was ready to go all the way, but that he would definitely be World Champion in the not too far off future. With Stevens being a player more suited to the long frame matches and, still only 30 years old, Thorne's prediction in 2000 may still come to be ."

It's dated and non-factual, and Mr One Tournament Win and Lost All His Money On Gambling is hardly a decent source for predictions and insight. 62.56.72.216 (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Performance

Does anyone have any theories on why he has achieved so little in best-of-9 tournaments? Is it motivational? He doesn't seem to take time to hit form in longer matches. Is he as good as his career rankings suggest? [The previous unsigned comment was added by MartinUK (talk · contribs), 18:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)]

No theory to offer, but the last question doesn't parse. His career rankings are determined by his performance, so by definition he must be as good as his career rankings suggest. :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 20:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plagiarism

Resolved. Misunderstanding

This whole article seems to have been ripped off from Answers.com. This article needs to be completely rewritten for a number of reason. Mglovesfun 14:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

answers.com is a mirror of Wikipedia! Catchpole 14:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
as stated above answers.com is a mirror of wikipedia. So infact the article on answers.com har been "ripped off" from wikipedia. --CrazyChip 12:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Article does still need work, but that should be a new topic. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 07:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lots of work needed

Yes this article certaintly needs attention. He didn't first emerge in the 98 UK Champiosnhip he had in fact reached the semis the year before. Yes, big chunks of his career are missing so i'll work on it. Samasnookerfan (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)