Talk:MATADOR (weapon)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
MATADOR (weapon) is part of SGpedians' Resources
An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore.
To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Inadequacy of section "Other Singapore-designed weapons" in this article.

I've just finished reading this stub article, and noted that one of its sections is called Other Singapore-designed weapons. Although its contents are quite interesting, I believe that it has no place in this article as AFAIK none of the weapons listed in it (which even includes a ship!) is directly related to the subject of this article (the Matador LAW). In my opinion, that list should be in a wikiarticle of it own, entirely devoted to "Singapore-designed weapons".
Hence, unless anyone reasonably opposes, I'll remove the mentioned section and place the info that it contains in a separate article (includoing in it also the Matador).
Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 04:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I've turned the unwieldy list into a navbox {{Singapore-designed weapons}} instead. I think this might form the skeleton around which, to write a new article - Singapore's military-industrial complex. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)