Talk:Mass communication
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Move to Mass communication
Shouldn't this be moved to Mass communication?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Too vague
This is an incredibly vague article. There should be a definition, real-world applications, and then a description on how the field is usually studied and organized on the university level. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glumbert (talk • contribs) 22:24, 13 August 2006
- I'll adress both of these issues later this week. I just completed a university level course on Mass communication. ~MDD4696 23:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
please for the benefit of the younger generation and for those still in schools studying mass communication can we all have a better article on mass communication. let the world see what a beautiful course it is.
the world has a right to know how and why the world is fast becoming a global village and if we as the gate keepers of the society can not have a good article on what we are and what we stand for , then there is a problem. i believe there should be a better write up. with emphasis its credibility so that people can begin to appreciate the uniqueness mass communication.
m1
[edit] 23 March 2008 revert
On 19 Febrary 2008 an anonymous editor removed substantial portions of the article along with sources and replaced it with apparent original research.[1] I reverted to the 17 Feb. version. Edits since 19 Feb. appear to be cleaning up after the rewrite. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
