User talk:Martinphi/diffs1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ScienceApologist:

What, praytell, is so goddamn controversial about that statement?

Personal attack on my talk page:

Martin, you are so well practiced in double-speak that I find this response to be so outrageously evasive and duplicitous as to be almost not worth reply.

Clarivoyance diffs:

Fyslee:

• In violation of ArbCom
• quack "scientists" don't count

• [1]

• [2]

Mccready:

[3]

See also edit summary accusation of sock puppetry:

[4]

Please use the talk page? As if he had?

[5]

Threatens another ArbCom, says I mis-interpret current one, cites minority-definition source which the article does not contain:

[6]

Accuses of 3RR, as if a uninvolved party, and removes sources:

[7]

ASTRAL PROJECTION:

Svetovid:

[8]

[9]

Pseudoscientific assertion:

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

Finally instead of edit warring, uses a tag:

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]