User talk:Markan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Srleffler 06:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good job with the intro to Water!

I just wanted to say I liked your edits to the intro to the article on Water. It really streamlined what was a cumbersome paragraph and made it much more readable. ONUnicorn 13:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A plan to improve Wikipedia's accuracy and QoW (Quality of Writing)

I'm starting a small project to improve the quality of Wikipedia. In particular, I hope to gather a group of people together to maintain a list of "best-to-date" revisions of articles, which will help the general public steer clear from quality-eroding updates, thereby reducing the need for edit wars. I've written some software to aid us in this task. If you're knowledgeable (especially about the limits of your knowledge), have good writing skills, play well with others, and want to help, please get in touch with me.

Markan 18:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Physics Article WIP proposal

Hello, as an editor who has previously added to the Physics article and taken part in discussions on its talk page I thought a current proposal may be of interest to you. Over the past few months the article has suffered from a lack of focus and direction. Unfortunately the article is now judged by a number of editors to be in a relatively poor state. There is currently a proposal to start a full consensus based review of the article. That review and consensus process has been proposed here, your thoughts on the proposal and participation in the WIP review of the article would be much appreciated. It disappoints me that an article on one of the fundamental sciences here at wikipedia is in such a relatively poor state, and I hope you can have a browse by the page to offer your views and hopefully participate. Thanks, SFC9394 22:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)