Talk:Mark Morford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Where does the claim that notes & errata is no longer published come from? Do they mean no longer in the print version? Online copy still exists. -- nae'blis 23:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

It's still printed in the hard-copy editions of the SF Chronicle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.243.149.1916 (talk) 23:22, December 13, 2006

[edit] Iconoclast

Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons (talk • contribs).

Why not ask Morford? I'm pretty sure he'd agree that he's an iconoclast. In fact, he'd probably be complemented.

Atlant 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the great tips!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.180.115 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Douchebag

One aspect not covered in this wiki entry is the fact that Mark Morford is a huge fucking douchebag. Should this be a new "Douchebag" section, or can it just go into the existing body text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.60.236 (talk) 19:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)