Talk:Mark DeSaulnier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance in Politics. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] Removal of background information
I removed the following line: "His father, a judge, committed suicide after being accused of corruption and battling a gambling addiction [1]." This current piece of imformation, as the page is currently formated, fits awkwardly in the section. If more background information is found, this sentence should be added.
[edit] Controversial Policies
Hey! I cited the very articles of legislation that were not only partisan but seriously misguided. I provided links to the State website which clearly states the facts included in the proposed legislation, not to mention copies of the bills themselves. What is up with the censor? From the note that was sent me I only did what was encouraged by wiki policy (unless it is clearly the point of view of a non-liberal on wikipedia as has been so clearly demonstrated in this act of removal) I did not make those additions lightly, and they took me a fair amount of time to source. AB 2235 is over the top was critiqued by the NRA-ILA and I referenced that and AB 1617 was unconstitutional and VETOED by the governor, thats a pretty damn powerful critique which was referenced. My careful critique and facts were erased and I am not happy about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skipingrock (talk • contribs) 20:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
