Talk:Marjorie Bruce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.
Middle Ages Icon
Middle Ages Portal
Marjorie Bruce is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

Contents

[edit] Was there really a cage...?

The Book "Girl in a Cage" is historical fiction, not a sort of scientific source. The author herself, Jane Yolen, noted that she heard about the imprisonment in a cage from some folk song (see: [1]).

This, however, is supposed to be an encylopedia presenting facts or at least marking fiction and assumptions appropriately.

Maybe the article should be split into the scienfific "facts" and "Marjorie Bruce in fiction"... - or is there any historical proof, document, ... disclosing this cage-fact? --LostJedi 10:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

As I see, 24.214.181.57 changed the text so that Edward only planned to incage Marjorie, without any evidence for that... So my question is still unanswered. LostJedi, 5 May 2006

[edit] Last Words?

Could we please have a source for Marjorie's alleged last words? I suspect they are pure invention. Rcpaterson 22:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I wondered about this myself. Since she had a pretty difficult life it seems a pity to deprive her of her claim to triumph. However her phraseology seems surprisingly modern, and at the time her son was born it was far from clear that he would become king. PatGallacher 22:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
She seems to be speaking modern Scots, but she would actually have spoken Norman French or the Northumbrian dialect of Middle English. Here is an example of Scots speech from that time [2] you will see that it is a good deal broader that this (admittedly very brief) quote. PatGallacher 23:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fredome
Middle French or Gaelic surely; English for talking to horses. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for puting a citation request on this page, but I think it will be a long time coming. Let's be frank: these words are unmitigated rubbish. What she really said was, and I quote-"Oh, great; a boy-the three wise women told me he will be king hereafter, on the death of his uncle (not yet born} on 22 February 1371. I can rest easy." This was all in broad Scots, ye ken,-or Gaelic, or perhaps even in Norman French (or perhaps it was Middle French); but since I have no knowledge of any of these languages I have provided an approximate English translation, somehow or other. I will remove the offending words in the very near future; unless by some miracle a reference-a credible reference-is forthcoming. Rcpaterson 08:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The offending words have now been excised. Rcpaterson 03:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The quote, of course, does look like rubbish (which is why I haven't commented before), given the fake-Scottish English it is written in, and the fact that the original author has done nothing to confirm it.
But - just my thoughts - would such words, were they uttered at that time, be so unlikely? Remember that the King had no male heir at that time by his second wife (admittedly because Elizabeth had spent a lot of their marriage locked up in England), which would have made her son a likely heir to Robert the Bruce (the alternative being Edward Bruce, Robert's brother, who was not yet dead). I don't see why Marjorie couldn't, at the time of her death, have had very good reason to think that her son, the first legitimate new-born male to the Bruce family in quite a while, would have inevitably succeeded to the crown. Michaelsanders 20:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I read Steve Boardman's Early Stewart Kings last month, and started revising Robert II on the basis of my illegible notes. Among the bits I've done in a sandbox is this footnote: "Robert's birth is sometimes described as being by caesarian section, but this is uncertain. Marjorie's death is, however, placed in 1316 or 1317: Barrell, p. 121; Boardman, p. 3; Brown, p. 214." So, Marjorie may have died giving birth to Robert, but it's less than certain. Her famous last words do not appear in Boardman's book. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Isabella of Buchan

Recently, I read 'The Greatest Traitor - The Life of Sir Roger Mortimer', in which the Scottish Wars (in which Mortimer fought) received some mention. Among passages relevant to this subject were these: "[Bruce] sent his womenfolk, including his sister and mistress, northward with his brother, Sir Neil Bruce, to Kildrummy Castle...[King Edward] had not captured Robert Bruce himself, buthe had in his custody the man's wife, mistres, brother, sisters and daughter...the most vindictive punishments of all were reserved for Bruce's sister, Mary, and his mistress, Isabel, Countess of Buchan." I accordingly added a reference in this article to Isabella being Bruce's mistress. It was removed for not being proven. Who is in the wrong?

Also, there was no mention of Edward having intended to cage Marjorie. Michaelsanders 16:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Caesarean section?

As nobody has been able to back this up I have deleted it. The claim that Robert II was delivered by Caesarean section seems dubious, since in those days this was only done where the mother had already died, the first Caesarean sections which the mother survived were only carried out in the 18th century. PatGallacher 18:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heir?

Is there a clear reference to her ever being the heir? I seem to remember reading somewhere that the Scots Parliament recognised Edward Bruce as the heir at one point. Rules of succession were less clear cut in those days. PatGallacher 13:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

According to Barrow's Robert Bruce, p. 381, she was heir, after Robert and Edward, by tailzie in the Act of 27 April 1315 at the Ayr Parliament. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
And at last the Records of the Parliaments of Scotland website is up and running, so you can see the "ordinance and statute entailing the crown on the heirs male of the king, Edward Bruce and then on the heirs general of the king" at http://www.rps.ac.uk (Robert I, 1315, 26 April). Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)