Talk:Margaret Cunneen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Flag
Portal
Margaret Cunneen is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Source

[edit] Perception of unfairness... why?

Could someone explain to me (or give a link) why "Perception of unfairness" is a problem for a prosecutor? I can understand "Perception of unfairness" applying to the judge and jury, but why should it apply for the prosecution (or defense) lawyers. Their whole job is to take sides. Peter Ballard 05:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Its all explained in the link!

The court found Ms Cunneen had "deliberately or without sufficient reflection" breached rules for barristers and prosecutors by speaking about one of her current cases. The rules were designed to guarantee the integrity of the criminal justice system. Any breach "may diminish public confidence in that system", it said.

The court said Ms Cunneen had implied in her speech that MG was guilty even though his appeal was still pending. This displayed "partiality" and a "lack of detachment" and "potentially compromised her capacity to fairly prosecute" the case.

Basically if the prosector acts out of line like she did, what else might she be doing that no one knows about? or atleast cause the question to be asked. This can hang over the head of the conviction and even be grounds for an appeal.--Polygamy4 16:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)