Template talk:Manned ISS flight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Manned

I dont like the use of Manned, seems male chauvinistic to me, should be Human ISS flight.Hektor 03:33, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

No, Manned doesn't imply male. Richard Taylor 00:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm thinking of RM'ing the Human Spaceflight articles. It's political correctness gone mad. Manned is the more used term. --GW_Simulations_{|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail} 18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bolded items

Why are some items (Soyuz and all future flights) in bold? Rillian 16:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the Soyuz ones, as for FF's, I did all of those, and I probably just copied a Soyuz... --GW_Simulations_{|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail} 18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I originally bolded the Soyuz ones just so you could see at a glance which missions were soyuz and which were space shuttles.. without something they kinda blend together; i'd prefer some visual difference, like bolding, or colour, but i'm not fussy. Mlm42 18:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sequence of future flights as per Expeditions

I've taken the liberty of reordering the future STS and Soyuz flights so as to conform to the various expedition schedules listed elsewhere here, in particular Expedition 17, Expedition 18, Expedition 19 and Expedition 20. All subject to change, of course, but it would seem as STS flights are adjusted here and there, the presumption should be that these schedules are more or less intact. The dates on some of the individual flights are clearly wrong, or at least not sourced. Canada Jack (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)