Talk:Manananggal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manananggal article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology .

This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
 WikiProject Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Southeast Asia-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article falls within the scope of the Brunei work group. If you are interested in articles relating to Brunei, please visit the project page to see how you can help.

Contents

[edit] Manananggal

We need to merge all but 2-3 sentences of that. Anyone object? ---J.S (t|c) 22:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

That sounds reasonable. This particular section is long and should just be a short definition anyway. I vote "aye". (~Asul)

Please feel free to edit. I really would like to see this article look more professional and encyclopedic.--Jondel 12:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oww

That image is...really green. Isn't there any traditional art of this? --Masamage 00:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Changed background color into something of lesser intensity (lighter green). -- Dragonbite 02:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

I heartily support this merge. There are several other articles about essentially the same beast which could all be combined. --Masamage 23:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I dare say that a creature who breaks off its torso to fly is significantly different from a creature that pulls its head off and carries its organs trailing behind. --Scottandrewhutchins 16:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I was about to say the same thing. The Malaysian version pulls off its head. Their different.--Jondel 02:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Not to mention that the cultural context is vastly different. After all, we're dealing with a mythological creature here, not a real one. I don't think there's viable reason for thinking that these two creatures are the same species. Odin is not Zeus, after all.--Alternativity 09:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose-technically they are still humans, not beasts. Besides their morphological characteristics (head vs. torso and fangs vs. long tongue) proves that they are different creatures. Finally, we are talking of two different cultures here, not just one. Actually, it is more reasonable for Zeus and Jupiter to merge than these two to merge.--Lenticel (talk) 10:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strongly Oppose - citing the rationale already covered above Alternativity (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair Use

Clarification, please? If I were to take an image from, say, Arnold Arre's The Mythology Class and add it here as an example of an version of the manananggal, would that constitute fair use? --Alternativity 09:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The easy way is to put it in the article and give reasons for fair use. However, the chances of getting it deleted is high. The hard way is to contact the creator and get his permission for the image. Ask User:Seav, he may know more about this mechanism. Of course, the best way is to create your own!--Lenticel (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Malaysian Penanggal

I propose a merge with the penanggalen article as this section talks about the Malaysian creature rather than the manananggal.--Lenticel (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

This should be kept separate. This are two different topics based in two different countries.Jondel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.50.170.46 (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You misunderstood. I was talking about merging this section. Not the whole article. --Lenticel (talk) 08:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)