From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] May 2008
Your recent edit to Girls Aloud (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 11:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of I FUCKED THE GREAT HAGRID IN IBIZA
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as I FUCKED THE GREAT HAGRID IN IBIZA, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Twinzor (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
You have been
blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with
Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for
vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|
your reason here}} below.
–– Lid(Talk) 11:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I want to edit constructively with this account, and I was stupid. Please, allow me to return constructively under this account, and take it up at the WP:ANI. And, I'm not disputing Thatcher's findings anymore about the old Stone put to sky (talk • contribs • logs) account - I was wrong and plain stupid. I ask for a full investigation at WP:ANI. Oh, and in full disclosure interests, I've heard that the former sockpuppetteer that you know as the North Carolina vandal appears to want to come back, and edit constructively. Well, there's my full story. I'm a stupid idiotic editor, I've paid my price for it, and now, well, I want to edit constructively again. --Maggs66 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Regardless of who you are (Grawp OR stone put to sky) you may not continue to edit under an abused second account. Please return to your first account, and request an unblock there. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.