Talk:Magic Roundabout (Hemel Hempstead)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Source
"after the opening the driver of an articulated lorry failed to understand the new junction so tried to drive straight across the middle. " Seems a little unlikely. Lorries often attempt to short cut across the midle of roundabouts, probably if the driver has lost attention. Any source for this? Rich Farmbrough 13:19, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- sorry to only just reply to this now ... source is me, or rather seeing the resultant lorry stuck in the middle (not the attempt to get across) as I lived nearby when it was built. The roundabout is maybe 90-100yds across and the central area is raised, so drivers can't see the whole way across. Details were reported in the local newspaper too. --Vamp:Willow 14:04, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Only bidirectional roundabout with a surface river through it
"The roundabout is widely believed to be the only roundabout with a surface river running through it, however, this is not the case. The A377 through central Exeter, Devon uses the two bridges over the river Exe as a roundabout, allowing the traveller to go to Torbay and Plymouth to the south, the M5 motorway to the east and North to Barnstaple. It is thought the only bi-directional roundabout with such a feature."
Not So! The "egg" in Tamworth, Staffordshire is a large bi-directional roundabout with a river (The Anker) running through it. See: http://www.multimap.com/map/photo.cgi?client=public&X=421000&Y=304000&width=700&height=400&gride=421000&gridn=304000&srec=0&coordsys=gb&db=freegaz&pc=&zm=0&scale=25000&multimap.x=360&multimap.y=235
Yeah I'd like to add another, it's not a roundabout, and it's not bi-directional but here's one inbetween Church Crookham, Fleet, Farnborough and Aldershot: http://www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?client=public&X=483250&Y=153500&scale=5000&width=700&height=400&gride=483250&gridn=153500&lang=&db= The Aerial Photos arn't up to date though. - JamMan 14.00 22nd Sept 06
[edit] River stuff removed
The whole 'river' section has got way oversized and detailed about things nothing to do with the actual article concerned; ideally if it is to exist at all it needs to be on the Roundabout article instead. I've also never seen a source cited for the "widely believed" statement anyway (I used to live there and am still in the area and I've never met anyone anywhere who doesn't realise *lots* of roundabouts have rivers through them!) so it shouldn't be there for that reason either. --AlisonW (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

