User talk:MadSquirrel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Loudness war

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Loudness war, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jrod2 05:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Please don't revert my external link deletions without discussing it with me next time. Most external links that are posted to older articles, tend to be posted by people who have a connection to the reference web site itself. So, trying to determine the importance of such additions should be every Wikipedian's foremost concern. I've read the explanation by the author of the ProRec article and I find it to be sufficient. However, I am deleting the other one you reverted. I am weighing the importance of having more external links added against using this web site's content to enhance the LW article. And even though I do think is a good article, it's redundant as the most basic points have been touched by the other ones. Although Org site makes it more suitable to be included, the amount of ads, doesn't. There are others with about the same amount of ads, but somewhere down the line, editors have to draw one to stop the proliferation of spam. Therefore, unless another editor besides you and the one who posted the link, believes that it should be re-posted, I would leave this issue alone and not revert it again. Thanks. Jrod2 22:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Paul Simon - The Rhythm Of The Saints.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Paul Simon - The Rhythm Of The Saints.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)