Talk:Madrigal (music)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Madrigal (music) is within the scope of WikiProject Music, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to music. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

I have read this article and I am sorry to say that I do not feel very enlightened by it- inasmuch as I cannot grasp what it is about the madrigal style which sets it apart from other styles of singing. I hope someone can find a way of expressing this more clearly IceDragon64 18:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Please see the Wiktionary entry, which describes the later Madrigal form as polyphonic and for around six voices. This was more what I was expecting. IceDragon64 18:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I moved Monteverdi from Classic Madrigalists to Late Madrigalists -- there was no reason, based on chronology, that he should be grouped in with a bunch of high-Renaissance composers instead of the late-16th/early-17th century composers who are in the latter group. This was presumably a simple error in the first place. BluesEtude 18:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, obvious mistake. Thanks for fixing it. Antandrus (talk) 01:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Composers

I feel like the list of composers section needs to be polished. Right now, it is not clear what the point is. Is it a list of all composers of madrigals? Is it a selection of significant composers of madrigals? What criteria were used to select these composers? I think if the editors of this article are clear on the criteria, we can mention them in the section header. We might also want to add some information for each composer, such as birth and death years, or years of madrigal composition. I can work on this. I just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts. - Geoffg (talk) 06:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Apparently it dates from the early days of the project; the initial author of the article put in a few names of what he thought the significant composers were in each chronological/geographical category. I think it would be better to lose the lists and weave the names into the text. A complete article would discuss the various stages of development of the madrigal, including regional varieties, with the significant names appearing in the appropriate place. Then we don't have to justify the selection (otherwise imagine the many hundreds of names we'd need to have in the list, of Italians alone!) Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you. It would be better to scrap the lists, and write a longer history section that mentions the significant composers. - Geoffg (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Explanation for why I deleted the external link marshall.charles.googlepages.com - English translations and recordings from the Fourth Book of Monteverdi's Madrigals

For an explanation of my decision to delete this external link, please see this Pasiphae discussion page which is just one example of the way Wikipedia is going. Charles Marshall --Charlesmarshall65 (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)