Talk:Machine rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] can this be netrual

since this is being writen by humans can it be netrual?

I don't understand your question, but if you believe there's some POV problems, perhaps you would care to elucidate? FrozenPurpleCube 02:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

What he mean is that humans shouldn't be considered to be more right than computers, and therefore we can't say something neutral. I think he's really confused...

I believe that machines should rule the world —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.215.118 (talk) 23:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

He says that the suppressed can't have a neutral view on their situation. etc etc.

Anyway, why is there a header called "in fiction", has this ever happened in real life? Mallerd (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Why is this filed under 'types of government' if it never occured? Will there be an endless list of potential government types? Arachnocracy (rule by arachnids), GenModMonkocracy (rule by genetically modified monkeys), Alienocracy (rule by space aliens). All addressed in sci-fi at some point, so potentially just as viable as 'Robocracy'. I vote for removal. Handelmg (talk) 18:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

How many books and films are there about arachnocracy etc? Machine rule is more often a source of inspiration than those others. Mallerd (talk) 19:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)