User talk:Lukeatomic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Episodes
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits as you are doing at the Arrested Development episode pages, your edits are in violation of WP:NOT#DIR,, WP:V, WP:OR WP:TRIVIA, WP:NPOV, WP:EPISODE and WP:FANCRUFT. Why do you think it's a good idea to state every running joke mentioned? AD is based on running jokes and this is not a fansite, look at some TV episode GA's and FA's to see how episode articles are supposed to look like, if you wish to add trivial details I suggest you go to a fansite, thank you. The Dominator (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Also note, you compared them to A Streetcar Named Marge except for the fact that that article has no jokes explained at all, has every piece referenced and everything is relevant. It also doesn't lift lines straight from the show. The Dominator (talk) 14:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- As you did not even have the courtesy to reply, you're edits will now be reverted and I will take this through dispute resolution. The Dominator (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits and pointed out policies which they violate, but you insist on reverting, not only the trivia deletion, but also my deleted image fixing and typo fixes and you have not replied yet so there is very little I can do. Note the three revert rule and please take your time to read the policies and guidelines linked and do not revert again, either discuss, or if you wish take it to dispute resolution, thank you. The Dominator (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- As you did not even have the courtesy to reply, you're edits will now be reverted and I will take this through dispute resolution. The Dominator (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. I told you not to revert, very well let's go to WP:DR. The Dominator (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Since you continue to ignore me, I have posted at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#user Lukeatomic, feel free to comment there. The Dominator (talk) 23:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- You have now violated the 3RR rule on at least two articles and will most likely be blocked for the violation, I have warned you several times. The Dominator (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
