User talk:Luke0101
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Rationale for the Iraq War
Hello Luke, Please participate on the talk page. You are reverting text without any explanation. We cannot collaberate if you will not communicate. Raggz (talk) 05:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Luke, you need to participate on the TALK page. If you do not, the administrators will be asked to contact you regarding this issue. Raggz (talk) 06:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Luke, your edits at Rationale for the Iraq War are mostly happening within the article, not within TALK. I have also often done this and frustrated editors who had to write to me and ask me to get consensus on TALK first. Please read Consensus. I still do what you are doing, but now far less than when I was as new as you are. There is no firm rule that says you can never edit the article directly, and I think that sometimes you should (but far less frequently). Regards - Raggz (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] January 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Clinical depression worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Clinical depression, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 02:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome!
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Collectonian (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Treatment of Depression
A tag has been placed on Treatment of Depression requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 23:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to The Odyssey (1962 Lassie TV series episodes) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry --Luke (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Fault line war
A tag has been placed on Fault line war requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Fault line war has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cluster bomb.PNG
[edit] Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Cluster bomb.PNG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7407631.stm. As a copyright violation, Image:Cluster bomb.PNG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Cluster bomb.PNG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
-
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Cluster bomb.PNG and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Cluster bomb.PNG with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Cluster bomb.PNG.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.
[edit] Problems with upload of Image:A.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:A.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
